If you’ve suffered injuries by an accident that occurred in Texas. That was caused by multiple negligent parties you might still be entitled to compensation. Even though if you’re partially responsible. But, Texas follows modified comparative negligence rules that may limit or even eliminate compensation based on the degree of your responsibility.
The process of navigating comparative negligence claims in the best way to maximize your recovery. But it requires specialized legal knowledge of comparative negligence in texas. The presence of a knowledgeable attorney for personal injuries in TX on your side makes it easier for you to win. Also you can defends your rights in every step of the proceeding.
The laws governing comparative negligence in Texas are not a reason to restrict you from seeking damages because you are sharing part of the fault. However, the state has the strict 51% rule that “divide all claims if found to be more than 51 percent negligent.” It is essential to know the process so that you can get the highest amount you are entitled to.
Contents
- 1 What is Comparative Negligence?
- 2 Texas’ Modified Comparative Negligence Rule (The 51% Bar)
- 3 How Fault is Determined in Texas
- 4 Proving Negligence
- 5 How Comparative Negligence Affects Your Claim
- 6 Examples of Comparative Negligence in Different Accident
- 7 Why You Need a Lawyer in Comparative Negligence Cases
- 8 Multiple Parties and Comparative Fault
What is Comparative Negligence?
Comparative negligence is a term used to describe laws which allow reduced damages. When a plaintiff who has been injured according to their percentage of responsibility for the accident. It is also known as the Contributory Negligence.
In the past, Texas followed traditional contributory negligence rules, which prohibited any claim if the defendant was even just 1% to blame. However, in 1973, the state changed to the modified law of comparative negligence.
A person who has been injured is still able to recover damages even if partially at fault. However there are certain limits based on their level of responsibility. Understanding the process of comparative negligence Texas is essential to anyone seeking an injury claim or damages.
Texas’ Modified Comparative Negligence Rule (The 51% Bar)
Texas uses the modification to the comparative negligence rules. In other words, a person who is injured can’t claim any compensation when they are determined to be more than 51% responsible for the incident. If their share of blame is less than 50 then their damages are reduced based on the percentage of fault.
For instance, if you receive $1000 in damages, but you were found to be 25% responsible. Then you can only allowed to recover $750. However, if you’re greater than 51% at fault the amount you are awarded is zero. This is also known in”the “51% bar”.
How Fault is Determined in Texas
In cases of comparative negligence the jury or court will have to determine percentages of blame of both. The victim and defendant(s) that were involved in the incident. To determine party’s level of negligence, the investigator will look at:
- Know about the nature of act and the risks
- It is the ability to predict and prevent the risk of injury
- A thorough understanding of the circumstances
- Failure to adhere to laws, regulations or industry standards
- A sign of impairment or impairment due to alcohol
- Expert testimony regarding standards of care
The failure of a plaintiff to reduce damages or obtain prompt medical attention for injuries could be considered when determining the source of the blame.
Proving Negligence
In order to obtain damages from a personal injury case the onus is on the plaintiff to demonstrate:
- The defendant had the legal obligation of care
- The defendant breached the duty by committing a negligent act
- This breach has caused the plaintiff damages or losses
If there is a shared responsibility between multiple parties the plaintiff must demonstrate that each of the defendants was negligent and how their carelessness directly led to incident and the injuries.
How Comparative Negligence Affects Your Claim
Negligence in the context of comparative negligence can drastically reduce the amount you are compensated for damages such as medical bills, income loss as well as pain and suffering and many other injuries. For instance, if you have the amount of $10,000 in damages, and 20% of contributory negligence, you’d get an amount of $8,000.
In the context of the 51% standard, the calls about the 50/50 fault line become crucial. Being judged to be just a bit more reckless than the other party will cancel your claim completely. A professional Pearland personal injury lawyer, you can level your playing field.
Examples of Comparative Negligence in Different Accident
- Accidents involving vehicles – factors like driving too fast, distracted, drunk and ignoring traffic signals and failure to yield may be considered to be negligence in a comparative sense.
- Cases involving premises liability if you fall on a slippery floor and the business claims you didn’t pay attention. They could be equally at the blame for not putting up warning signage.
- medical malpractice. A physician could argue that you contributed to surgical complications through not disclosing the existence of health issues however, they may also be held accountable for mistakes.
- Accidents involving slips and falls property owners might argue that you were not paying attention to the direction you were heading. Poor lighting, a inadequate handrails, or dangerous surfaces could be part of the blame.
Why You Need a Lawyer in Comparative Negligence Cases
Comparative negligence is a complicated legal and tactical issues. It could undermine your claim if not dealt with properly. A skilled personal injury lawyer will protect your rights in the following ways:
- In 51% rule to get the best result possible
- Inquiring about fault and creating a claim against the responsible parties
- Contesting unreasonable claims of negligence that are contributory
- Negotiations with insurance companies for the best settlement
- Promoting a fair allocation of the blame at trial
- It is difficult to recover damages without legal counsel.
Multiple Parties and Comparative Fault
It is normal for several defendants to share responsibility in personal injuries. Texas permits you to pursue the compensation of any person that caused your injury through negligence. Each defendant is solely responsible for the proportion they share.
This is why conducting a thorough investigation of the cause of the fault and identifying all possible defendants is crucial. Attorneys with experience know how to handle cases that involve several negligence parties within Texas.